# Bi-invariant metrics in a Lie group

Let \(G\) be Lie group, we denote by \(\mathfrak g\) it’s Lie algebra. Let \(L_x,R_x\) be the differentials of \(y \mapsto x\,y\) and \(y\mapsto y\,x^{-1}\) at the identity \(e \in G\).

A bi-invariant metric on \(G\) is a Riemannian metric on \(G\) such that \(\langle X , Y \rangle_x = \langle L_y R_z X , L_y R_z Y \rangle_{yxz^{-1}}\) for all \(x,y,z \in G\) and \(X,Y \in T_x G\). We begin by characterizing such metrics.

Proposition 1There is a correspondence between bi-invariant metrics on \(G\) and Ad-invariant scalar products on it’s Lie algebra.

*Proof*: Given a scalar product \(\langle\ ,\ \rangle_e\) on \(\mathfrak g\) we
define (using the same notation) on \(T_g G\) a scalar product \(\langle X , Y \rangle_g = \langle L_{g^{-1}} X, L_{g^{-1}} Y \rangle_e\), this is a left-invariant metric on \(G\), now given \(X,Y \in T_xG\) then given two vectors tangent at \(x\),

Conversely, if we start with a bi-invariant metric, it is easy to see that it’s restriction to the Lie Algebra is a Ad-invariant. \(\Box\)

It turns out that for connected Lie groups, bi-invariant metrics on \(G\) are actually the same as ad-invariant scalar products on it’s Lie Algebra –those who satisfy \(\langle [X,Y],Z\rangle + \langle Y,[X,Z]\rangle = 0\), indeed

\[\frac d {dt} \langle Ad_{exp(tX)} Y , Ad_{exp(tX)}Z \rangle \rvert_{t = s} = \langle [X,Ad_{exp(sX)}Y], Z \rangle + \langle Ad_{exp(sX)}Y, [X,Z]\rangle\]Since the image of the exponential map, generates the connected component of the identity, one invariance gives the other.

## A Little of Riemannian Geometry

The Riemannian connection on a manifold is uniquely determined by the formula

\[\begin{array}{rcl} \langle \nabla_X Y,Z \rangle &=& \frac 1 2 \{ X\langle Y,Z\rangle + Y\langle X,Z\rangle - Z\langle X,Y\rangle \\ && - \langle [Y,Z],X \rangle - \langle [Y,Z],X \rangle -\langle [Y,X],Z \rangle \} \end{array}\]In the case of a Lie group with a bi-invariant metric, since everything is constant along \(G\) the terms of the form \(X\langle Y,Z\rangle\) vanish, and using the fact that the bracket of two left-invariant vector coincides with the left-invariant vector coming from \([X_e,Y_e]\in \mathfrak g\), the formula above implies that for left-invariant vector fields \(X,Y\) we have

\[\nabla_X Y = \frac 1 2 [X,Y]\ .\]Note that by the previous formula one parameter subgroups are geodesics, conversely given any geodesic \(\gamma\), such that \(\gamma(0) = x, \dot \gamma(0) = L_xX\) for \(X \in \mathfrak g\), then \(\alpha(t) = x \exp( tX)\) is a path such that, \(\dot \alpha(t) =L_x X (\exp(tX)) = X (\alpha (t))\) then by uniqueness \(\alpha = \gamma\), so geodesics starting at the identity are in 1-1 correspondence with one parameter subgroups, in particular those are defined for all \(t \in \mathbb R\) so the existence of a bi-invariant metric implies that \(G\) is a complete Riemannian manifold.

In particular using Jacobi identity, the tensor curvature becomes

\[R(X,Y)Z =\nabla_{[X,Y]} Z - [\nabla_X,\nabla_Y ] Z = \frac 1 4 [[X,Y],Z]\]Choosing orthogonal vector fields, the sectional curvature is

\[K(X,Y) = \langle R(X,Y)X, Y \rangle = \frac 1 4 \langle [X,Y],[X,Y] \rangle \geq 0\]For a unitary vector \(X\) we choose an orthonormal basis \(\{Z_1= X, Z_2 \dots , Z_n\}\) of \(\mathfrak g\), And the Ricci curvature becomes

\[\text{Ric}_x (X) = \sum_{i=1}^n K(X,Z_i) =-\frac 1 4 \sum_{i=1}^n \langle [X,[X,Z_i],Z_i\rangle = -\frac 1 4 \text{tr}(ad_X ad_X).\]So what does it means to have a bi-invariant metric? it’s easier to start with a ad-invariant scalar product, the most important example of a bi-linear form on a Lie Algebra which is ad-invariant –an the only example in the semisimple case– is the Killing form, defined by

\[k(X,Y) = \text{tr}( ad_X ad_Y)\]this won’t be a scalar product, since it’s non degenerate if and only if the algebra is semi simple nor is going to be positive definite, but there is a special case, namely Compact Lie Algebras, where by definition the Killing form is negative definite. One remark is that since the Killing form is ad-invariant, every ideal has a orthogonal complement, so we have a decomposition \(\mathfrak g = Z(\mathfrak g) \oplus [ \mathfrak g , \mathfrak g ]\), where \(Z(\mathfrak g)\) is the sum of the 1-dimensional ideals and \([ \mathfrak g , \mathfrak g ]\) is semisimple, in particular the killing form is non degenerate in that ideal

Proposition 2: A compact Lie Group admits an bi-invariant metric.

*Proof*: given any scalar product \(\langle , \rangle_0\) on \(\mathfrak g\), choose a Haar measure on \(G\) then define

this is clearly a Ad-invariant scalar product on \(\mathfrak g\), so it defines a bi invariant metric on \(G\). \(\Box\)

Proposition 3: A Lie Group with discrete center is compact iff it’s Lie Algebra is compact.

*Proof*: If the Group is compact, by the previous proposition there is a ad-invariant scalar product on the Lie algebra on which \(ad_X\) is skew-symmetric hence it has only pure imaginary eigenvalues, so the Killing form is negative semi-definite, since it is degenerate exactly on \(Z(\mathfrak g) = 0\), then it must be negative definite. Conversely if the Lie algebra is compact, the Killing form is negative definite on \(\mathfrak g = [\mathfrak g, \mathfrak g]\) so taking it’s negative, we have a bi-invariant metric on \(G\), for \(k\) is negative definite using Bonnet Myers Theorem \(G\) must be compact. \(\Box\)

As a corollary, the universal cover must be also compact and the fundamental group of \(G\) must be finite. with small modifications we have the following theorem

Theorem 4: A Lie algebra is compact if and only if it is the Lie algebra of a compact simply connected semisimple Lie Group The Killing Form on a Lie Algebra is negative semidefinite if and only if it is the Lie Algebra of a product of a Euclidean space and a compact simply connected semisimple Lie Group

In particular every compact Lie group must be a quotient, by a discrete subgroup of

\[\mathbb T ^n \times K_1 \times \dots \times K_m\]where all the \(K_i\)’s are simply connected compact simple Lie groups. there is a theorem who states that any Lie Groups deformation retracts into a maximal compact subgroup, combining that and the fact that cover maps induce isomorphisms on the fundamental groups \(\pi_n\) for \(n \geq 2\) we have

Proposition 5: For any Lie Group \(\pi_2(G)\) is trivial.

*Proof*: we only have to check the list of simple simply connected compact Lie groups, these are \(SU(n)\) and \(SO(n)\), using the fibrations

it’s easy to show that \(\pi_2\) is trivial, it left as an exercise to check the same for the compact exceptional groups. \(\Box\)